Islamabad: In the case of Justice Qazi Faiz Issa, the Supreme Court sought solutions to four questions from the Federal Government.
A ten-member full courtroom of the Supreme Court headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial heard petitions towards the proceedings of the Supreme Judicial Council in reference towards Justice Qazi Faiz Issa. Former Law Minister Forough Naseem, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister Shehzad Akbar and Secretary for Law and Justice Malaika Bukhari appeared within the Supreme Court.
Justice Qazi Faiz Issa's lawyer Munir A. Malik, whereas objecting to Forough Naseem, has made it clear in a case to the Supreme Court personal lawyer can not seem earlier than the federal government and provides arguments.
Justice Umar Ata Bandial mentioned that the federal authorities has full proper of illustration, one Attorney General Anwar Mansoor retired and the opposite Attorney General apologized for pursuing the case, now the federal authorities has to rent a lawyer to help the courtroom. , The objection just isn’t applicable, we are going to concern a call in your request.
Forough Naseem mentioned that three properties in London are within the identify of the youngsters and spouse of the esteemed choose. If you don't give cash path then it’s misconduct.
Justice Qazi Amin mentioned that what’s the drawback of the federation with the properties of the judges, can the judges be questioned with out proof and criticism? If there isn’t any concrete proof then why the credibility of judges is questioned, isn't the federal government's motion towards the independence of judges and judiciary?
The Supreme Court, whereas looking for solutions to four questions and arguments from Forough Naseem, mentioned that it’s alleged that the fabric towards Justice Qazi Faiz was collected illegally, it’s important to give arguments on the authorized assortment of fabric, criticism Why have been the belongings despatched to the Recovery Unit and to not the President or the Judicial Council?
Justice Maqbool Baqerne requested in what capability did the Assets Recovery Unit gather the data?
Justice Sajjad Ali Shah mentioned that the federal authorities ought to have supplied a duplicate of Waheed Dogar's criticism to the petitioner choose. The paperwork of Waheed Dogar's criticism have been requested ten instances by the courtroom. The paperwork have been proven on media a number of instances however the courtroom Not given.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah requested what’s the Assets Recovery Unit, first state how the criticism reached the unit and what’s the relation of this unit with Article 209.
The Supreme Court adjourned additional listening to of Justice Qazi Faiz Issa's case until tomorrow.